HAVE I SEEN IT BEFORE?
"A Jewish prince is betrayed and sent into slavery by a Roman friend in 1st-century Jerusalem, but it's not long before he regains his freedom and comes back for revenge."
- The chariot race is truly incredible. I knew it was considered one of the greatest action sequences of all time, but I was still prepared to be a little underwhelmed, given its age. Upon seeing it, however, I wholeheartedly agree, it really is one of the best action sequences I've ever seen. The action is dynamic and gripping, the camerawork is stunning, and it combines two things I've praised in the past - practical effects and car stunts (or, at least, the 1st-century version of car stunts)
- At the time the chariot race alone cost 1 million dollars to film, which would be the equivalent of 10.6 million today. I also must acknowledge, I was somewhat biased against this movie because I thought it was the one that had multiple horses die during its making, but I was wrong - that would be the silent version of Ben-Hur that was released in 1925. As far as I can tell, no horses were hurt during the making of the 1959 Ben-Hur
- So if you haven't seen Ben-Hur's chariot race, I do highly recommend it, even if you don't care to watch the rest of the movie. I mention this also because, to put it bluntly, the rest of the movie is boring as shit
- Admittedly, I'm being deliberately flippant here. There's some entertainment to be found in the scale and grandiosity inherent to so many movies of this type, and there are a few other memorable moments, including the scenes set on a Roman ship where Ben-Hur was enslaved as a rower, as well as a naval battle that was pretty unlike anything I'd ever seen before. But the vast majority of the movie outside of the chariot race was really not interesting to me, to the point that I wonder if I'm being overly generous giving Ben-Hur a 5/10 considering the chariot race takes up about 10 minutes of a 212-minute movie. Take that as one last indication of how great I thought that sequence was
- Going into it I knew that this was a religious movie of some sort - the book it's based on is subtitled A Tale of the Christ. I didn't really know how Jesus would factor into the story, though. Turns out Ben-Hur and Jesus were going down adjacent paths, only intersecting at a few key moments, and the movie is bookended by Jesus's birth and death. And while I found it a little jarring when the movie shifted focus to Jesus's crucifixion, its depiction was undeniably effective, even for an atheist like me
- Finally, Ben-Hur set a record at the Oscars in 1960, winning 11. This number has never been beaten and it wasn't even tied until Titanic in 1998 (and then tied again by The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King in 2004). Ben-Hur's Oscars included a Best Actor win for Charlton Heston, and I do believe this will be the last Heston movie we'll be talking about after he showed up in Touch of Evil and Planet of the Apes. When I reviewed Touch of Evil I commented on the fact that Heston was playing a Mexican character, but I think it's also fair to mention that at the time of Touch of Evil and Ben-Hur Heston was a staunch Democrat and advocate for civil rights (as was Orson Welles, the director of Touch of Evil). All of this may be surprising given Heston's political views later in life. Also surprising - the egregious brownface used on actor Hugh Griffith in Ben-Hur, a Welsh actor playing a character named Sheik Ilderim, and also a performance that won Best Supporting Actor (somewhat inexplicably, in my opinion; aside from the brownface it wasn't even that memorable a role or performance and not terribly significant to the movie as a whole)